<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 85 f/1.8 vs f/1.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.austinmann.com/trek/archives/502/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.austinmann.com/trek/archives/502</link>
	<description>A travel blog by Austin Mann</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:40:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tk</title>
		<link>http://www.austinmann.com/trek/archives/502/comment-page-1#comment-5943</link>
		<dc:creator>tk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austinmann.com/trek/archives/502#comment-5943</guid>
		<description>agreed 100%. 
I own a 1.8 and this past week got shot behind a 1.2 and found it not worth the .6 stop. So glad a wise man advised me to buy my 1.8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed 100%.<br />
I own a 1.8 and this past week got shot behind a 1.2 and found it not worth the .6 stop. So glad a wise man advised me to buy my 1.8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Isaacs</title>
		<link>http://www.austinmann.com/trek/archives/502/comment-page-1#comment-5904</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Isaacs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austinmann.com/trek/archives/502#comment-5904</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never shot with the 1.2 - but I will say that the 85 f/1.8 is the most dependable, sharpest lens in my bag. It doesn&#039;t hunt like the 50mm f/1.4 in low light, and it&#039;s deadly sharp, even wide open. Even for fast-moving subject, it locks on: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tbisaacs/3561681360/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never shot with the 1.2 &#8211; but I will say that the 85 f/1.8 is the most dependable, sharpest lens in my bag. It doesn&#8217;t hunt like the 50mm f/1.4 in low light, and it&#8217;s deadly sharp, even wide open. Even for fast-moving subject, it locks on: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tbisaacs/3561681360/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/tbisaacs/3561681360/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Snell</title>
		<link>http://www.austinmann.com/trek/archives/502/comment-page-1#comment-5902</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austinmann.com/trek/archives/502#comment-5902</guid>
		<description>Well said Austin.
I totally agree.. though, i&#039;ve never used the 1.2 ... 
lol.. this article makes me happy and proud  of my trusty 1.8 =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Austin.<br />
I totally agree.. though, i&#8217;ve never used the 1.2 &#8230;<br />
lol.. this article makes me happy and proud  of my trusty 1.8 =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary s. chapman</title>
		<link>http://www.austinmann.com/trek/archives/502/comment-page-1#comment-5899</link>
		<dc:creator>gary s. chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austinmann.com/trek/archives/502#comment-5899</guid>
		<description>Good review with a lot of wisdom. I have both lenses and have a real love/hate relationship with the 1.2.  I miss the focus mark all of the time with it. But, when it is on, it looks great. I have the same problem (to a lesser degree) with the 50 1.2 vs the 1.4. The 50mm 1.4 makes a lot of noise when focusing though.

Good work,

gary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review with a lot of wisdom. I have both lenses and have a real love/hate relationship with the 1.2.  I miss the focus mark all of the time with it. But, when it is on, it looks great. I have the same problem (to a lesser degree) with the 50 1.2 vs the 1.4. The 50mm 1.4 makes a lot of noise when focusing though.</p>
<p>Good work,</p>
<p>gary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

